Catch an expensive refrigerator-filter selection before Muse orders it
At a glance
A shopper reviews Meta Muse's $150 refrigerator-filter selection and reports finding a $20 option with Google Search. This workflow is listed under shopping, price-comparison, human-review, agent-failure.
The user asked Muse to order two air filters for his refrigerators. When Muse nearly ordered a pair for $150, he compared the selection with a simple Google search.
How it went
He reports finding the filters for $20 and describes the attempted shopping task as a failure.
Worth knowing
The account describes a near-order. The $150 is the proposed purchase price, rather than an amount the user reports having spent.
Save ideas in this browser. Upvotes count across the board.
A user built a meal-prep grocery list in Meta AI, then asked Muse to shop from it—hit a same-company link/context gap, a real friction in agent shopping handoffs.
One user split roles cleanly: Meta Muse handles grocery carts, DoorDash, and Amazon errands as a PA, while Grok Bot stays the workhorse for work automation.
One shopper let Muse research purchases and ended up buying through Shopify instead of the Amazon tab they would have opened—agent as comparison shopper, not just a chatbot.
Joe Zappa reports Muse took a full hour to place a grocery delivery order, a blunt real-world data point on agentic commerce latency even when the purchase eventually completes.