Skip to content
UsecaseBoard
← All use cases
hackernewsClaude-Code

Claude Code skills plus scheduled GitHub agents automate review and triage

At a glance

An HN commenter described a Claude Code setup with reusable skills for a UI library/Storybooks/APIs, a post-change review agent, PR checklist reviews, scheduled docs/coverage agents, and ticket triage that leaves a halfway-done plan on each issue. This workflow is listed under Claude-Code, Code-Review, CI, Agent-Tooling.

Agents / tools
Claude Code

Building a tool for these workflows? See weekly rates.

Save ideas in this browser. Upvotes count across the board.

Prompt excerpt

Using our repo skills for UI/Storybook/API conventions: review this change deeply, then on PR open run the markdown checklist. Nightly: scan last month’s commits for docs drift and e2e coverage gaps. For new tickets: leave a triage comment with a proposed plan—don’t merge without human review.
Explore all →
hackernewsCI

CircleCI Chunk sidecars validate agent code in microVMs before CI

CircleCI's Chunk sidecars run scoped microbuilds in Firecracker/E2B microVMs that mirror CI, hooking agent stop/eval events so Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor changes are validated before commit—~27s microbuilds and 3–5× lower token burn on retries in their tests.

ChunkClaude CodeCodex+2
Source ↗
hackernewsClaude-Code

Kelos runs Claude Code and Codex in K8s pods that retry when CI fails

Kelos orchestrates Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, or OpenCode in ephemeral Kubernetes pods as CRDs—watching bug issues, drafting fix PRs, self-reviewing, and retrying when CI fails—while the author still does final review and merge.

KelosClaude CodeCodex+1
Source ↗